Posthuman Figuration: Difference between revisions
(Added note.) |
m (Added image.) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{cquote|Blasphemy has always seemed to require taking things very seriously. I know no better stance to adopt from within the secular-religious, evangelical traditions of U.S. politics, including the politics of socialist feminism. Blasphemy protects one from the Moral Majority within, while still insisting on the need for community. Blasphemy is not apostasy.{{sfn|Haraway|1990|p=190}}}} | {{cquote|Blasphemy has always seemed to require taking things very seriously. I know no better stance to adopt from within the secular-religious, evangelical traditions of U.S. politics, including the politics of socialist feminism. Blasphemy protects one from the Moral Majority within, while still insisting on the need for community. Blasphemy is not apostasy.{{sfn|Haraway|1990|p=190}}}} | ||
[[File:Cyborg-phf.jpg|thumb]] | |||
Much postmodern criticism seeks to locate the subject in areas of dislocation. That is, any single ideological construction or essential position is inadequate to describe, define, and locate the [[Posthuman Figuration/post-|postmodern]] subject. These singular ideologies, artifacts of the Enlightenment, have become ossified remnants of universals that were never truly [[Posthuman Figuration/-human|universal]]: the ideologies and truths of the tyrannical patriarchy are social, political, economic, and religious institutions. The questioning of the very foundations of these oppressive and marginalizing ideologies may be likened to acts of [[Posthuman Figuration/blasphemy|blasphemy]] against the orthodoxy—a mythical position that questions the very mythology from which it springs: that of the satanic adversary. | Much postmodern criticism seeks to locate the subject in areas of dislocation. That is, any single ideological construction or essential position is inadequate to describe, define, and locate the [[Posthuman Figuration/post-|postmodern]] subject. These singular ideologies, artifacts of the Enlightenment, have become ossified remnants of universals that were never truly [[Posthuman Figuration/-human|universal]]: the ideologies and truths of the tyrannical patriarchy are social, political, economic, and religious institutions. The questioning of the very foundations of these oppressive and marginalizing ideologies may be likened to acts of [[Posthuman Figuration/blasphemy|blasphemy]] against the orthodoxy—a mythical position that questions the very mythology from which it springs: that of the satanic adversary. | ||
Latest revision as of 07:55, 20 February 2020
| intro | post/human | figuration | RL/VR | blasphemy |
Introduction[a]
| “ | Blasphemy has always seemed to require taking things very seriously. I know no better stance to adopt from within the secular-religious, evangelical traditions of U.S. politics, including the politics of socialist feminism. Blasphemy protects one from the Moral Majority within, while still insisting on the need for community. Blasphemy is not apostasy.[1] | ” |
Much postmodern criticism seeks to locate the subject in areas of dislocation. That is, any single ideological construction or essential position is inadequate to describe, define, and locate the postmodern subject. These singular ideologies, artifacts of the Enlightenment, have become ossified remnants of universals that were never truly universal: the ideologies and truths of the tyrannical patriarchy are social, political, economic, and religious institutions. The questioning of the very foundations of these oppressive and marginalizing ideologies may be likened to acts of blasphemy against the orthodoxy—a mythical position that questions the very mythology from which it springs: that of the satanic adversary.
This hypertext examines a secularized notion of blasphemy, how it is possible to blaspheme in a society that lacks absolute beliefs, and how that act of blaspheming effects the blasphemer’s body/embodiment. I theorize how the religious notion of blasphemy has been transferred to the secular in contemporary acts of resistance to any monolithic ideology that seeks to control, define, and embody any universal order. The notion of the posthuman body, an embodied amalgam of heterogeneous influences, continuously constructs and deconstructs identity to the point where any single notion or belief becomes not only an erroneous conception of identity, but becomes destructive and oppressive in its continuously growing monomania. The posthuman body is able to function in a world of polyphony and divergent technologies: the body becomes a place of dialectic and play, where the heteroglossia of technology and ideologies can work, synthesize, and produce the figuration that is capable of functioning meaningfully in a fragmented world of conflicting verses; the notion of blasphemy, then, becomes the very medicine for everyday life.
Note
- ↑ This hypertext was originally written in the spring of 1999 as a kind of intertextual, inter-class project. I was taking Anthony Kubiak’s Drama and Performance class and Betsy Hirsh’s Postmodern & Feminist Theory class, and I used this project as a way to bridge the two courses.
Citations
- ↑ Haraway 1990, p. 190.
Work Cited
- Haraway, Donna (1990) [1985]. "A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s". In Nicholson, Linda J. Feminism / Postmodernism. New York: Routledge. pp. 190–233.
