September 15, 2019
From Gerald R. Lucas
Mailer’s Political Resonance
Themes
- Fascism is humanity’s natural state[1]
- against political correctness[2]
- “we’ve got to find a way to say human nature is both ugly and beautiful, and we have to deal with both.”[3]
- “Americans are angrier now than at any time I’ve ever seen them.” — “rage”[4]
- flag conservatism and moral reform[5]
- See the end of Hitchens (1997) for a likely scenario of a fascist takeover. In some ways, it seems similar to Trump’s America, though instead of solely against black Americans, it also demonizes Mexicans and Muslims.
- Baumann (2016) compares Mailer’s analysis of Barry Goldwater and his supporters to Trump and his with some striking similarities.
- could happen quickly because of our lack of tradition[8]
- “Compulsive adoration of our leaders is poison, after all.”[9]
- against political correctness[2]
- Personal Responsibility (The Necessity of Criticism)
- “When you have a great country, it’s your duty to be critical of it so it can become even greater.”[10]
- “The politics of Norman Mailer have conventionally been evaluated more as a personal register of the American zeitgeist, and less as owing any debt or duty to ideology.”[11]
- Left Conservative — “a challenge to those who remain fixed in orthodoxy or correctness”[12]
- Cancer is an outgrowth of inaction or conformity.[13]
- “Culture’s worth huge, huge risks. Without culture we’re all totalitarian beasts.”[14]
- Democracy is noble and always threatened[1]
- “Democracy is existential”[15]
- We cannot take democracy for granted because it is always in peril and always changing.[16]
- Is hard-won and maintained: “The only defenses of democracy, finally, are the traditions of democracy.”[1]
- “Democracy is a state of grace attained only by those countries that have a host of individuals not only ready to enjoy freedom but to undergo the heavy labor of maintaining it.”[17] [bold mine]
- “If our democracy is the noblest experiment in the history of civilization, it may also be the most singularly vulnerable one.”[18]
- “inimical to security”[19] — Mailer hopes there’s not another national crisis to push us toward fascism (Was Obama’s presidency that thing for those who are now in power?)
- depends on critical distinctions[20]
- links freedom to democracy, and asserts it’s just as delicate — also the thing he likes most about America[18]
- “Democracy is existential”[15]
- Corporate Capitalism
- “Corporate power is running this country now.”[21] (See the discussion that follows.)
- against corporations,[2] as they expanded into American life since WWII[22]
- contradiction; leads to greed in a “Christian nation”[23]
- “Marketing was a beast and a force that succeeded in taking America away from most of us.”
- created a culture of interruption that led to a deterioration of concentration. Mailer was talking about commercials on television, so arguably this problem has gotten worse with our devices and notifications.[25]
- likens corporatism to “the pall of plastic”[24]
- the aim of technological society is to work everything over to plastic[26]
- Technology inspires totalitarianism[14]
- “Technology has become the dominant culture in existence and may soon be the only real culture.”[27]
- contributes to “the deterioration of the powers of concentration, like florescent lights, bad architecture, invasive marketing and ubiquitous plastic[28]
- frays the soul[28]
- substitutes power for pleasure, making us narcissistic and power-driven[26]
Citations
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Mailer 2003, p. 70.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Hitchens 1997, p. 117.
- ↑ Hitchens 1997, p. 127.
- ↑ Hitchens 1997, p. 121.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, pp. 50, 52.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, pp. 51–52, 57.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, p. 53.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, pp. 108–109.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, p. 85.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, p. 15.
- ↑ Hitchens 1997, p. 115.
- ↑ Hitchens 1997, p. 116.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, p. 19.
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 Hitchens 1997, p. 126.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, p. 16.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, pp. 16–17.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, p. 71.
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Mailer 2003, p. 110.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, p. 106.
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 Mailer 2003, p. 108.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, p. 104.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, p. 48.
- ↑ Hitchens 1997, p. 120.
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 Mailer 2003, p. 46.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, pp. 89–91.
- ↑ 26.0 26.1 Mailer 2003, p. 92.
- ↑ Mailer 2003, pp. 88–89.
- ↑ 28.0 28.1 Mailer 2003, p. 91.
Working Bibliography
- Baumann, Paul (March 23, 2016). "Mailer on Trump". Commonweal. Retrieved 2016-10-01.
- Begiebing, Robert (2020). "Norman Mailer and Joseph Ellis: Unsettling Dialogues on Democracy". The Mailer Review. 12 (1).
- Binelli, Mark (May 2007). "Norman Mailer". Rolling Stone. pp. 69, 72.
- Busa, Christopher (1999). "Interview with Norman Mailer". Provincetown Arts. pp. 24–32. Retrieved 2019-09-15.
- Hitchens, Christopher (1997). "Norman Mailer: A Minority of One". New Left Review. 22 (March/April): 115–128.
- Mailer, Norman (2013). "Immodest Proposals". Mind of an Outlaw. New York: Random House.
- — (2003). Why Are We at War?. New York: Random House.
- Mailer, Norman; Mailer, John Buffalo (2006). The Big Empty. New York: Nation Books.
- McAfee, Andrew (October 23, 2019). "Technology Will Keep Us From Running Out of Stuff". Wired. Retrieved 2019-10-24.
- Pritchard, William (November 24, 2016). "Stormin' Norman". Washington Examiner. Retrieved 2019-10-01.
- Sheed, Wilfred (1971). "Norman Mailer: Genius or Nothing". The Morning After: Selected Essays and Reviews. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. pp. 9–17.
- Wade, Francis (August 12, 2019). "Reading 'The Armies of the Night' in an Age of Youth Protest". LA Review of Books. Retrieved 2019-09-15.